Radek Stepanek vs Juan MonacoDavis Cup WG SF: CZE vs ARG Round Robin

Davis Cup WG SF: CZE vs ARG · ATP · Round Robin
47 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 13 September 2013
hard
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLL
Stepanek R.
7-6 6-3 6-2
Monaco J.
Stepanek R.
77663
Monaco J.
6332

Radek Stepanek defeated Juan Monaco 7-6 6-3 6-2 in the Davis Cup WG SF: CZE vs ARG round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Radek Stepanek came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Radek Stepanek extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Radek Stepanek closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–3 6–2.

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-08-12Cincinnati MastersR32hardRadek Stepanek7-6(2) 6-1
2012-05-13Rome MastersR32clayJuan Monaco6-4 6-2
2011-08-29US OpenR64hardJuan Monaco6-4 6-1 2-0 RET
2009-07-10Davis Cup WG QF: CZE vs ARGRRcarpetRadek Stepanek7-6(5) 6-3 6-2
2008-10-12Madrid MastersR64clayRadek Stepanek6-1 6-1
2005-09-26Ho Chi Minh CityQFcarpetRadek Stepanek6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Stepanek R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Monaco J.

Monaco J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Stepanek R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
71%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (141 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
64
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
82
Break points won·Clear edge
39
55
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About