Shuai Peng vs Marion BartoliOeiras Round of 32

Oeiras · WTA · Round of 32
40 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2013
clay
41 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
Peng S.
6-0 1-6 6-4
Bartoli M.
Peng S.
6162
Bartoli M.
0641

Shuai Peng defeated Marion Bartoli 6-0 1-6 6-4 in the Oeiras round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Marion Bartoli came in leading the head-to-head 6–4. Shuai Peng narrowed the head-to-head to 6–5.

Key context

Head to head

46
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-08-06MontrealR32hardMarion Bartoli6-1 6-3
2012-02-20DubaiR32hardShuai Peng6-4 6-3
2011-09-26TokyoR16hardMarion Bartoli6-2 6-1
2011-02-21DohaQFhardMarion Bartoli6-2 6-2
2010-04-12CharlestonR32clayShuai Peng2-6 7-6(2) 4-3 RET
2009-05-04RomeR64clayMarion Bartoli6-0 7-6(3)
2008-05-19StrasbourgR16clayShuai Peng6-1 1-0 RET
2007-10-15ZurichR32hardMarion Bartoli6-7(4) 6-0 6-1
2006-04-10CharlestonR64clayMarion Bartoli6-1 6-4
2004-09-27GuangzhouR16hardShuai Peng6-1 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Peng S.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bartoli M.

Bartoli M.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Peng S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
7.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
37
74
Break points saved·Clear edge
52
76
Break points won·Clear edge
74
92
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
67
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About