Kevin Anderson vs Richard Gasquet — Paris Masters Round of 32
Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 October 2012 ·
hard
Anderson K.7-6 4-6 6-1
Gasquet R.
Anderson K.
7462
Gasquet R.
6611
Kevin Anderson defeated Richard Gasquet 7-6 4-6 6-1 in the Paris Masters round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Richard Gasquet came in leading the head-to-head 7–3, defending last year's round of 16. Kevin Anderson narrowed the head-to-head to 7–4.
Key context
- Match story: Kevin Anderson came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 4–6 6–1.
Head to head
3–7| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-01 | Tokyo | QF | hard | Richard Gasquet | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2017-06-26 | Eastbourne | R16 | grass | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2017-05-01 | Estoril | QF | clay | Kevin Anderson | 6-2 3-6 7-6 |
| 2016-08-15 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Kevin Anderson | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2015-05-24 | Roland Garros | R32 | clay | Richard Gasquet | 4-6 7-6 7-5 6-4 |
| 2015-01-19 | Australian Open | R32 | hard | Kevin Anderson | 6-4 7-6 7-6 |
| 2014-03-19 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2011-11-07 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 7-6 |
| 2011-08-14 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2010-08-30 | US Open | R32 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 7-6 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
15.4
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
60
61
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
91
Break points won·Clear edge
4
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
93
88
Tiebreaks·Even
92
90
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast