Tomas Berdych vs Viktor TroickiDavis Cup WG QF: CZE vs SRB Round Robin

Davis Cup WG QF: CZE vs SRB · ATP · Round Robin
40 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 6 April 2012
clay
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
Berdych T.
6-2 6-1 6-2
Troicki V.
Berdych T.
6663
Troicki V.
212

Tomas Berdych defeated Viktor Troicki 6-2 6-1 6-2 in the Davis Cup WG QF: CZE vs SRB round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Tomas Berdych came in leading the head-to-head 6–1. Tomas Berdych extended the head-to-head to 7–1.

Key context

Head to head

61
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-12RotterdamR16hardTomas Berdych6-1 6-2
2015-01-19Australian OpenR32hardTomas Berdych6-4 6-3 6-4
2014-09-29BeijingR16hardTomas Berdych6-3 6-4
2012-06-11HalleR16grassTomas Berdych6-3 6-2
2011-06-06HalleQFgrassTomas Berdych7-6(3) 6-1
2010-03-11Indian Wells MastersR16hardTomas Berdych6-1 6-3
2009-03-12Indian Wells MastersR64hardViktor Troicki6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Berdych T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Troicki V.

Troicki V.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Berdych T.

Serve advantage — Berdych T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
7.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
82
62
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
91
Break points won·Dominant
70
27
Deciding sets·Even
87
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
85
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About