Tomas Berdych vs Janko TipsarevicDavis Cup WG QF: CZE vs SRB Round Robin

Davis Cup WG QF: CZE vs SRB · ATP · Round Robin
40 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 6 April 2012
clay
42 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Berdych T.
7-6 7-6 7-6
Tipsarevic J.
Berdych T.
7878793
Tipsarevic J.
666667

Tomas Berdych defeated Janko Tipsarevic 7-6 7-6 7-6 in the Davis Cup WG QF: CZE vs SRB round robin on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Janko Tipsarevic came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Tomas Berdych narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

25
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-05-21DusseldorfFclayJanko Tipsarevic7-5 7-6(8)
2011-11-20Tour FinalsRRhardTomas Berdych2-6 6-3 7-6(6)
2011-11-07Paris MastersR16hardTomas Berdych7-5 6-4
2011-08-29US OpenR32hardJanko Tipsarevic6-4 5-0 RET
2011-08-08Canada MastersQFhardJanko Tipsarevic6-4 6-4
2010-09-17Davis Cup WG SF: SRB vs CZERRhardJanko Tipsarevic7-5 6-2 2-6 7-6(5)
2004-10-25StockholmR32hardJanko Tipsarevic3-6 7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Berdych T.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tipsarevic J.

Tipsarevic J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Berdych T.

Serve advantage — Berdych T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
93
Break points won·Dominant
70
38
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About