Na Li vs Lucie Safarova — Cincinnati Round of 32
Cincinnati · WTA · Round of 32
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2011
hard
Li N.6-3 6-4
Safarova L.
Li N.
662
Safarova L.
34–
Na Li defeated Lucie Safarova 6-3 6-4 in the Cincinnati round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Na Li came in leading the head-to-head 6–1, defending last year's round of 16. Na Li extended the head-to-head to 7–1.
Key context
- Match story: Na Li closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.
Head to head
6–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-13 | Australian Open | R32 | hard | Na Li | 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3 |
| 2012-08-06 | Montreal | SF | hard | Na Li | 3-6 6-3 7-5 |
| 2012-04-23 | Stuttgart | R32 | clay | Na Li | 7-6(4) 6-4 |
| 2012-01-09 | Sydney | QF | hard | Na Li | 6-2 7-6(3) |
| 2009-10-05 | Beijing | R32 | hard | Na Li | 4-6 6-0 6-4 |
| 2009-03-02 | Monterrey | QF | hard | Na Li | 6-3 7-6(3) |
| 2005-04-25 | Estoril | F | clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Li N.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
47%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
82
44
Break points saved·Even
89
89
Break points won·Dominant
96
50
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
47
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
50
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CPartly cloudy
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 55%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Jankovic J.
Peng S.
W/O
Sharapova M.
Stosur S.
6-36-2
Zvonareva V.
Hantuchova D.
6-37-66
Petkovic A.
Petrova N.
7-56-1
R16
Zvonareva V.
Martic P.
6-26-2
Jankovic J.
Schiavone F.
6-35-76-4
Petrova N.
Mchale C.
6-36-3
Hantuchova D.
Bartoli M.
6-35-76-3
Sharapova M.
Kuznetsova S.
6-26-3
Stosur S.
Li N.
6-43-66-4
Peng S.
Peer S.
6-36-2
Petkovic A.
Kvitova P.
6-36-3
R32
Stosur S.
Williams S.
W/O
Hantuchova D.
Pennetta F.
6-36-4
Petkovic A.
Arvidsson S.
6-26-4
Zvonareva V.
Makarova K.
6-36-0
Martic P.
Wickmayer Y.
3-66-26-2
Bartoli M.
Bondarenko A.
6-16-2
Sharapova M.
Rodionova A.
6-16-3
Kuznetsova S.
Cetkovska P.
4-66-36-4
Mchale C.
Wozniacki C.
6-47-5
Petrova N.
Ivanovic A.
6-37-64
Kvitova P.
Scheepers C.
7-636-3
Peer S.
Parmentier P.
6-26-3
Peng S.
Errani S.
6-26-4
Jankovic J.
Zheng J.
4-66-36-1
Schiavone F.
Kirilenko M.
7-53-66-4
Li N.
Safarova L.
6-36-4
R64
Hantuchova D.
Dominguez Lino L.
6-34-1
Scheepers C.
Marino R.
7-56-2
Cetkovska P.
Medina Garrigues A.
2-66-26-2
Petrova N.
Vinci R.
6-30-66-4
Makarova K.
Martinez Sanchez M.
7-56-3
Martic P.
Vesnina E.
3-67-656-0
Wickmayer Y.
Jovanovski B.
6-36-4
Mchale C.
Pironkova T.
7-54-66-1
Peer S.
Lisicki S.
6-47-64
Arvidsson S.
Niculescu M.
0-67-646-3
Petkovic A.
Gajdosova J.
5-77-656-2
Errani S.
Stephens S.
6-17-5
Ivanovic A.
Glatch A.
6-06-2
Pennetta F.
Pavlyuchenkova A.
2-66-36-3
Bondarenko A.
Morita A.
6-24-66-2
Rodionova A.
Hercog P.
6-06-0
Kuznetsova S.
Craybas J.
6-36-4
Stosur S.
Daniilidou E.
6-36-1
Williams S.
Hradecka L.
6-37-65
Safarova L.
Koukalova K.
6-26-2
Kirilenko M.
Zhang S.
7-626-3
Zheng J.
Goerges J.
6-21-66-4
Peng S.
Dulko G.
6-34-66-4
Jankovic J.
Benesova I.
6-06-3