Sabine Lisicki vs Agnieszka RadwanskaStanford Quarter-final

Stanford · WTA · Quarter-final
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2011
hard
37 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWW
Lisicki S.
7-6 2-6 6-2
Radwanska A.
Lisicki S.
77262
Radwanska A.
64621

Sabine Lisicki defeated Agnieszka Radwanska 7-6 2-6 6-2 in the Stanford quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Agnieszka Radwanska came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's semi-final, but Sabine Lisicki had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 4 on hard. Sabine Lisicki narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Sabine Lisicki closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

13
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-08-11CincinnatiR16hardAgnieszka Radwanska6-1 6-1
2014-08-04MontrealR16hardAgnieszka Radwanska6-1 3-6 6-3
2013-06-24WimbledonSFgrassSabine Lisicki6-4 2-6 9-7
2012-02-20DubaiQFhardAgnieszka Radwanska6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Lisicki S.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Radwanska A.

Radwanska A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lisicki S.

Serve advantage — Radwanska A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
47%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
18
78
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
85
Break points won·Dominant
36
97
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
72
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
65
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast