Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Ivan DodigDavis Cup WG R1: CRO vs GER Round Robin

Davis Cup WG R1: CRO vs GER · ATP · Round Robin
42 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
3 — 2
Sets
Friday, 4 March 2011
carpet
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWLL
Kohlschreiber P.
6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-4
Dodig I.
Kohlschreiber P.
6347863
Dodig I.
4666642

Philipp Kohlschreiber defeated Ivan Dodig 6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Davis Cup WG R1: CRO vs GER round robin on carpet. The result followed the form book — Philipp Kohlschreiber came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Philipp Kohlschreiber extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

32
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-08RotterdamR16hardPhilipp Kohlschreiber6-4 6-2
2013-06-24WimbledonR128grassIvan Dodig4-6 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-3 2-1 RET
2012-12-31DohaR32hardPhilipp Kohlschreiber7-6(5) 6-1
2012-10-21ValenciaR32hardIvan Dodig6-2 7-6(6)
2012-02-27Delray BeachR16hardPhilipp Kohlschreiber6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kohlschreiber P.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Dodig I.

Dodig I.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kohlschreiber P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
8.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
85
Break points won·Even
39
39
Deciding sets·Slight edge
51
45
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About