Kate Makarova vs Angelique Kerber — Bronx NY 100K Qualifying Round
Bronx NY 100K · ITF · Qualifying Round
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2010 ·
hard
Makarova K.6-2 6-4
Kerber A.
Makarova K.
662
Kerber A.
240
Kate Makarova defeated Angelique Kerber 6-2 6-4 in the Bronx NY 100K qualifying round on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Angelique Kerber came in leading the head-to-head 8–5. Kate Makarova narrowed the head-to-head to 8–6.
Key context
- Match story: Kate Makarova dropped just 6 games past Angelique Kerber.
Head to head
5–8| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-05 | Indian Wells | R64 | hard | Angelique Kerber | 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
| 2017-08-14 | Cincinnati | R32 | hard | Kate Makarova | 6-4 1-6 7-6 |
| 2017-05-29 | Roland Garros | R128 | clay | Kate Makarova | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2015-04-20 | Stuttgart | QF | clay | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2014-08-11 | Cincinnati | R32 | hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2014-06-16 | Eastbourne | QF | grass | Angelique Kerber | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2014-03-17 | Miami | R16 | hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-4 1-6 6-3 |
| 2013-06-17 | Eastbourne | R16 | grass | Kate Makarova | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2013-01-14 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | Kate Makarova | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2012-08-06 | Montreal | R32 | hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2012-06-25 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Angelique Kerber | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2012-06-18 | Eastbourne | QF | grass | Angelique Kerber | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2008-06-09 | Birmingham | R32 | grass | Kate Makarova | 6-7 7-5 7-5 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
73
87
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
72
Break points won·Even
95
98
Deciding sets·Clear edge
71
87
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
89
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About