Viktor Troicki vs Radek StepanekNew Haven Quarter-final

New Haven · ATP · Quarter-final
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 22 August 2010
hard
47 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWLWWW
Troicki V.
6-2 6-3
Stepanek R.
Troicki V.
662
Stepanek R.
23

Viktor Troicki defeated Radek Stepanek 6-2 6-3 in the New Haven quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Radek Stepanek came in leading the head-to-head 5–3. Viktor Troicki narrowed the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

35
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-04-29MunichR16clayViktor Troicki6-4 6-4
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardRadek Stepanek5-7 4-6 6-3 6-3 7-5
2012-05-21DusseldorfFclayViktor Troicki2-6 6-4 6-3
2010-09-17Davis Cup WG SF: SRB vs CZERRhardRadek Stepanek4-6 6-2 6-4 6-4
2010-08-15Cincinnati MastersR64hardViktor Troicki7-5 6-1
2009-11-08Paris MastersR32hardRadek Stepanek6-4 6-0
2009-08-16Cincinnati MastersR64hardRadek Stepanek7-6(2) 1-0 RET
2008-06-23WimbledonR64grassRadek Stepanek6-7(1) 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Troicki V.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Stepanek R.

Stepanek R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Troicki V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
62
64
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Clear edge
27
39
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
79
Tiebreaks·Even
70
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About