Sam Querrey vs Janko TipsarevicLos Angeles Semi-final

Los Angeles · ATP · Semi-final
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2010
hard
42 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Querrey S.
6-7 7-6 6-4
Tipsarevic J.
Querrey S.
637762
Tipsarevic J.
776541

Sam Querrey defeated Janko Tipsarevic 6-7 7-6 6-4 in the Los Angeles semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Janko Tipsarevic came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Sam Querrey narrowed the head-to-head to 4–4.

Key context

Head to head

34
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-04-08HoustonQFclaySam Querrey7-6(6) 7-6(4)
2016-08-29US OpenR128hardJanko Tipsarevic7-6(4) 6-7(0) 6-3 6-3
2013-08-11Cincinnati MastersR64hardJanko Tipsarevic6-7(5) 6-3 6-4
2012-05-27Roland GarrosR128clayJanko Tipsarevic2-6 6-4 7-6(3) 6-3
2011-03-10Indian Wells MastersR64hardSam Querrey6-4 6-4
2010-08-01WashingtonR32hardJanko Tipsarevic7-6(3) 6-3
2006-07-17IndianapolisR64hardSam Querrey6-4 6-7(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Querrey S.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Tipsarevic J.

Tipsarevic J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
81%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
14.8
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
49
57
Break points saved·Even
96
93
Break points won·Clear edge
14
38
Deciding sets·Even
63
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
55
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About