Jeremy Chardy vs Juan MonacoDusseldorf Round Robin

Dusseldorf · ATP · Round Robin
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 16 May 2010
clay
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLL
Chardy J.
6-3 6-4
Monaco J.
Chardy J.
662
Monaco J.
34

Jeremy Chardy defeated Juan Monaco 6-3 6-4 in the Dusseldorf round robin on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Juan Monaco came in leading the head-to-head 6–1, defending last year's round-robin. Jeremy Chardy narrowed the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Jeremy Chardy closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

16
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-03-19Miami MastersR128hardJeremy Chardy7-5 3-6 7-6(5)
2013-04-22BarcelonaR16clayJuan Monaco6-0 7-6(11)
2012-07-16HamburgQFclayJuan Monaco6-3 7-5
2012-06-25WimbledonR64grassJuan Monaco6-2 3-6 6-3 7-6(3)
2012-01-30SantiagoSFclayJuan Monaco6-1 6-4
2009-11-08Paris MastersR64hardJuan Monaco7-6(6) 7-5
2009-04-12Monte Carlo MastersR64clayJuan Monaco6-2 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Chardy J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Monaco J.

Monaco J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Chardy J.

Serve advantage — Monaco J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.2
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
82
Break points won·Dominant
28
55
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
62
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
56
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About