Nadia Petrova vs Tathiana Garbin — Rome Round of 64
Rome · WTA · Round of 64
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 May 2010
clay
Petrova N.6-3 6-2
Garbin T.
Petrova N.
662
Garbin T.
32–
Nadia Petrova defeated Tathiana Garbin 6-3 6-2 in the Rome round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nadia Petrova came in leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's round of 16. Nadia Petrova extended the head-to-head to 6–1.
Key context
- Match story: Nadia Petrova dropped just 5 games past Tathiana Garbin.
Head to head
5–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09-08 | Bali | R16 | hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-1 6-1 |
| 2007-12-31 | Gold Coast | R32 | hard | Tathiana Garbin | 5-7 7-5 6-3 |
| 2004-09-13 | Bali | QF | hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-1 7-5 |
| 2003-06-23 | Wimbledon | R128 | grass | Nadia Petrova | 6-1 6-3 |
| 2003-05-12 | Rome | R64 | clay | Nadia Petrova | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2001-07-30 | San Diego | R64 | hard | Nadia Petrova | 5-2 RET |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Petrova N.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
69%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
52%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
68
39
Break points saved·Dominant
85
59
Break points won·Clear edge
80
57
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
55
Tiebreaks·Even
62
62
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
19°CPartly cloudy
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 78%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Ivanovic A.
Petrova N.
6-27-5
Williams S.
Kirilenko M.
6-16-4
Jankovic J.
Williams V.
6-06-1
Martinez Sanchez M.
Safarova L.
7-666-4
R16
Petrova N.
Dulgheru A.
6-03-66-2
Safarova L.
Radwanska A.
1-66-37-61
Martinez Sanchez M.
Wozniacki C.
6-46-2
Williams S.
Petkovic A.
6-23-66-0
Kirilenko M.
Cibulkova D.
4-66-16-1
Williams V.
Peer S.
6-36-4
Jankovic J.
Wickmayer Y.
6-26-0
Ivanovic A.
Dementieva E.
6-17-65
R32
Williams S.
Bacsinszky T.
7-626-1
Jankovic J.
Mattek Sands B.
6-33-66-1
Ivanovic A.
Azarenka V.
6-46-4
Wozniacki C.
Camerin M.
6-16-0
Martinez Sanchez M.
Schiavone F.
6-26-2
Safarova L.
Pennetta F.
6-16-2
Petkovic A.
Kvitova P.
6-36-4
Radwanska A.
Vinci R.
6-16-0
Dulgheru A.
Safina D.
6-46-756-1
Petrova N.
Srebotnik K.
6-46-4
Dementieva E.
Shvedova Y.
6-47-5
Cibulkova D.
Brianti A.
6-36-4
Kirilenko M.
Kuznetsova S.
6-23-66-4
Williams V.
Schnyder P.
6-26-2
Peer S.
Hercog P.
2-67-56-3
Wickmayer Y.
Rezai A.
6-36-727-5
R64
Vinci R.
Kleybanova A.
7-667-65
Camerin M.
Zheng J.
6-44-66-4
Martinez Sanchez M.
Kudryavtseva A.
5-76-46-3
Petrova N.
Garbin T.
6-36-2
Brianti A.
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-47-65
Kirilenko M.
Oprandi R.
6-16-3
Azarenka V.
Karatantcheva S.
6-16-4
Ivanovic A.
Vesnina E.
6-16-3
Shvedova Y.
Jovanovski B.
6-26-2
Mattek Sands B.
Oudin M.
6-16-3
Rezai A.
Morita A.
6-46-2
Wickmayer Y.
Sprem K.
6-31-66-4
Schnyder P.
Dulko G.
6-756-27-65
Hercog P.
Arn G.
6-36-3
Peer S.
Dentoni C.
6-26-1
Bacsinszky T.
Zahlavova S.
6-06-4
Petkovic A.
Dushevina V.
6-36-0
Schiavone F.
Hantuchova D.
3-66-26-3
Pennetta F.
Amanmuradova A.
6-26-3
Safarova L.
Govortsova O.
6-26-796-3
Kvitova P.
Zvonareva V.
6-46-0
Srebotnik K.
Lepchenko V.
6-727-56-3
Dulgheru A.
Errani S.
2-66-16-4
Cibulkova D.
Parmentier P.
6-13-67-5