Sara Errani vs Anabel Medina GarriguesMarbella Round of 16

Marbella · WTA · Round of 16
39 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 April 2010
clay
43 yrs · 169 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Errani S.
6-1 7-6
Medina Garrigues A.
Errani S.
6772
Medina Garrigues A.
161

Sara Errani defeated Anabel Medina Garrigues 6-1 7-6 in the Marbella round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Anabel Medina Garrigues came in leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's semi-final. Sara Errani narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Sara Errani came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

23
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-08-08TorontoR64hardAnabel Medina Garrigues7-5 6-1
2011-07-04BudapestQFclayAnabel Medina Garrigues4-6 7-5 3-0 RET
2009-04-06MarbellaQFclayAnabel Medina Garrigues6-2 6-7(4) 7-5
2008-07-21PortorozFhardSara Errani6-3 6-3
2007-09-10BaliR16hardSara Errani7-5 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Errani S.serving50% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Medina Garrigues A.

Medina Garrigues A.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Errani S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
78%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
55%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
46%
Service points won·Even
52%
55%
Return points won·Even
48%
46%
Break points saved·Even
49%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
0.3
1.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 157). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
36
26
Break points saved·Dominant
8
48
Break points won·Clear edge
98
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
34
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About