Sam Querrey vs John IsnerMemphis Final

Memphis · ATP · Final
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 February 2010
hard
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Querrey S.
6-7 7-6 6-3
Isner J.
Querrey S.
637762
Isner J.
776531

Sam Querrey defeated John Isner 6-7 7-6 6-3 in the Memphis final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 5–4. Sam Querrey narrowed the head-to-head to 5–5.

Key context

Head to head

45
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-03-07Indian Wells MastersR64hardJohn Isner7-6(6) 7-6(2)
2021-05-31Roland GarrosR128clayJohn Isner7-6(2) 6-3 6-4
2019-02-25AcapulcoR16hardJohn Isner6-4 6-4
2018-08-13Cincinnati MastersR64hardSam Querrey6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5)
2016-01-11AucklandR16hardJohn Isner7-6(8) 6-7(4) 6-4
2015-08-16Cincinnati MastersR64hardSam Querrey6-3 7-6(3)
2015-02-09MemphisQFhardSam Querrey7-6(3) 7-6(2)
2010-05-03BelgradeFhardSam Querrey3-6 7-6(4) 6-4
2010-03-11Indian Wells MastersR32hardJohn Isner7-6(3) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Querrey S.serving97% hold

wins 78% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Isner J.serving97% hold

wins 78% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
81%
80%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
29%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
14.8
21.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
64
Break points saved·Even
96
99
Break points won·Clear edge
14
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
55
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast