Samantha Stosur vs Dominika CibulkovaStanford Round of 32

Stanford · WTA · Round of 32
42 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 July 2009
hard
37 yrs · 161 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Stosur S.
6-4 6-3
Cibulkova D.
Stosur S.
662
Cibulkova D.
43

Samantha Stosur defeated Dominika Cibulkova 6-4 6-3 in the Stanford round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Samantha Stosur came in leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's quarter-final. Samantha Stosur extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

Head to head

52
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-01-07SydneyR32hardSamantha Stosur3-6 6-3 6-4
2018-05-21StrasbourgQFclayDominika Cibulkova6-4 6-3
2017-02-13DohaQFhardDominika Cibulkova7-5 6-4
2014-05-26Roland GarrosR32claySamantha Stosur6-4 6-4
2014-05-05MadridR64claySamantha Stosur6-4 6-0
2012-09-24TokyoR16hardSamantha Stosur6-4 7-5
2012-05-28Roland GarrosQFclaySamantha Stosur6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Stosur S.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cibulkova D.

Cibulkova D.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Stosur S.

Serve advantage — Cibulkova D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
0.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
45
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
78
Break points won·Dominant
61
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
72
Tiebreaks·Dominant
47
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast