Maria Kirilenko vs Anna ChakvetadzeStanford Round of 32

Stanford · WTA · Round of 32
39 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 July 2009
hard
39 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLW
Kirilenko M.
6-4 5-7 7-6
Chakvetadze A.
Kirilenko M.
65772
Chakvetadze A.
47651

Maria Kirilenko defeated Anna Chakvetadze 6-4 5-7 7-6 in the Stanford round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Anna Chakvetadze came in defending last year's quarter-final, but Maria Kirilenko had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 6 on hard. Maria Kirilenko extended the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

Head to head

33
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-03-07Indian WellsR64hardMaria Kirilenko6-2 1-3 RET
2008-01-14Australian OpenR32hardMaria Kirilenko6-7(6) 6-1 6-2
2007-03-05Indian WellsR32hardAnna Chakvetadze6-4 6-1
2006-03-06Indian WellsR32hardAnna Chakvetadze6-2 6-3
2005-08-22New HavenR16hardAnna Chakvetadze6-3 6-3
2005-03-23MiamiR128hardMaria Kirilenko7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kirilenko M.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Chakvetadze A.

Chakvetadze A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Kirilenko M.

Serve advantage — Kirilenko M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
53%
51%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
59
55
Break points saved·Even
72
72
Break points won·Even
74
78
Deciding sets·Slight edge
71
66
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
49

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast