John Isner vs Marcos BaghdatisLos Angeles Round of 16

Los Angeles · ATP · Round of 16
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 July 2009
hard
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWWW
Isner J.
6-3 7-6
Baghdatis M.
Isner J.
67132
Baghdatis M.
3611

John Isner defeated Marcos Baghdatis 6-3 7-6 in the Los Angeles round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 7–0, defending last year's round of 32. John Isner extended the head-to-head to 8–0.

Key context

  • Match story: John Isner closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

70
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-07-18WashingtonR16hardJohn Isner7-6(3) 6-2
2016-06-27WimbledonR128grassJohn Isner7-6(2) 7-6(5) 6-3
2015-07-27AtlantaFhardJohn Isner6-3 6-3
2013-07-29WashingtonQFhardJohn Isner6-7(5) 6-4 6-4
2011-08-29US OpenR128hardJohn Isner7-6(2) 7-6(11) 2-6 6-4
2011-08-21Winston-SalemQFhardJohn Isner1-6 6-3 6-4
2011-08-08Canada MastersR64hardJohn Isner6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Isner J.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Baghdatis M.

Baghdatis M.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
56%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
29%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
21.7
7.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
64
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Dominant
0
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
64
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
98
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About