Francesca Schiavone vs Alona Bondarenko's-Hertogenbosch Round of 16

's-Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 16
46 yrs · 166 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 June 2009
grass
41 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Schiavone F.
4-6 7-5 6-3
Bondarenko A.
Schiavone F.
4762
Bondarenko A.
6531

Francesca Schiavone defeated Alona Bondarenko 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the 's-Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Francesca Schiavone came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, defending last year's round of 32. Francesca Schiavone extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2010-08-30US OpenR32hardFrancesca Schiavone6-1 7-5
2009-10-19MoscowSFhardFrancesca Schiavone6-4 6-0
2008-04-26Fed Cup WG PO: ITA vs UKRRRclayFrancesca Schiavone7-5 6-3
2007-05-07BerlinR64grassAlona Bondarenko5-7 6-2 7-5
2006-09-25LuxembourgFhardAlona Bondarenko6-3 6-2
2006-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayFrancesca Schiavone6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Schiavone F.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bondarenko A.

Bondarenko A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Schiavone F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
55%
71%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
54%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
0.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
51
Break points saved·Even
61
60
Break points won·Slight edge
72
77
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
72
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
36
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About