Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Lourdes Dominguez LinoFes Quarter-final

Fes · WTA · Quarter-final
43 yrs · 169 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2009
clay
45 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Medina Garrigues A.
7-6 7-6
Dominguez Lino L.
Medina Garrigues A.
77772
Dominguez Lino L.
6565

Anabel Medina Garrigues defeated Lourdes Dominguez Lino 7-6 7-6 in the Fes quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Anabel Medina Garrigues came in leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's final. Anabel Medina Garrigues extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

32
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-03-31CharlestonR64clayLourdes Dominguez Lino6-3 6-2
2013-07-15BastadR32clayLourdes Dominguez Lino6-1 6-2
2008-04-28FesR32clayAnabel Medina Garrigues4-6 6-2 6-1
2007-08-27US OpenR64hardAnabel Medina Garrigues7-5 6-2
2006-04-03Amelia IslandR64clayAnabel Medina Garrigues6-3 2-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Medina Garrigues A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Dominguez Lino L.

Dominguez Lino L.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Medina Garrigues A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
53%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
52%
50%
Aces / match·Even
1.2
0.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
20
Break points saved·Even
48
46
Break points won·Clear edge
75
56
Deciding sets·Clear edge
22
39
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
60
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About