Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Flavia Pennetta — Fed Cup WG SF: ITA vs RUS Round Robin
Fed Cup WG SF: ITA vs RUS · WTA · Round Robin
0 — 0
Sets
Saturday, 25 April 2009
clay
Kuznetsova S.6-0 6-3
Pennetta F.
Kuznetsova S.
662
Pennetta F.
03–
Svetlana Kuznetsova defeated Flavia Pennetta 6-0 6-3 in the Fed Cup WG SF: ITA vs RUS round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Svetlana Kuznetsova came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Svetlana Kuznetsova extended the head-to-head to 6–2.
Key context
- Match story: Svetlana Kuznetsova handed Flavia Pennetta a first-set bagel in a 6–0 6–3 win.
Head to head
5–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-06-22 | Eastbourne | R32 | grass | Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2015-02-23 | Doha | R32 | hard | Flavia Pennetta | 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
| 2013-08-26 | US Open | R32 | hard | Flavia Pennetta | 7-5 6-1 |
| 2011-02-14 | Dubai | SF | hard | Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2010-08-02 | San Diego | SF | hard | Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6-4 6-0 |
| 2009-05-04 | Rome | R16 | clay | Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6-3 3-6 6-0 |
| 2003-08-25 | US Open | R128 | hard | Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6-1 6-1 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Clear edge
66%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
79
71
Break points saved·Even
81
83
Break points won·Even
89
89
Deciding sets·Clear edge
85
69
Tiebreaks·Even
82
78
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About