Jelena Jankovic vs Carla Suarez NavarroMarbella Final

Marbella · WTA · Final
41 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 April 2009
clay
37 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLW
Jankovic J.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Suarez Navarro C.
Jankovic J.
6362
Suarez Navarro C.
3631

Jelena Jankovic defeated Carla Suarez Navarro 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Marbella final on clay. Jelena Jankovic extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Jelena Jankovic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

44
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-08-29US OpenR64hardCarla Suarez Navarro6-1 6-4
2016-02-06Fed Cup WG2 R1: ESP vs SRBRRhardCarla Suarez Navarro6-4 6-2
2013-09-30BeijingR16hardJelena Jankovic6-0 6-0
2012-10-01BeijingR16hardCarla Suarez Navarro7-5 6-4
2012-05-07MadridR64clayCarla Suarez Navarro4-6 7-6(5) 6-4
2012-01-02BrisbaneR32hardJelena Jankovic6-4 6-2
2008-06-23WimbledonR64grassJelena Jankovic6-1 6-3
2008-05-26Roland GarrosQFclayJelena Jankovic6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Jankovic J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Suarez Navarro C.

Suarez Navarro C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Jankovic J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
59
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
80
57
Break points won·Slight edge
91
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
50
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About