Jelena Jankovic vs Anabel Medina GarriguesMarbella Semi-final

Marbella · WTA · Semi-final
41 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 April 2009
clay
43 yrs · 169 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Jankovic J.
7-5 6-2
Medina Garrigues A.
Jankovic J.
762
Medina Garrigues A.
52

Jelena Jankovic defeated Anabel Medina Garrigues 7-5 6-2 in the Marbella semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jelena Jankovic came in leading the head-to-head 7–0. Jelena Jankovic extended the head-to-head to 8–0.

Key context

Head to head

70
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-05-09RomeR16clayJelena Jankovic6-4 2-6 6-2
2011-03-21MiamiR16hardJelena Jankovic6-1 6-3
2010-05-10MadridR16clayJelena Jankovic6-2 6-0
2009-04-25Fed Cup WG PO: ESP vs SRBRRclayJelena Jankovic6-3 3-6 6-3
2008-03-10Indian WellsR16hardJelena Jankovic6-3 6-3
2007-05-07BerlinR32grassJelena Jankovic6-3 2-6 7-5
2005-10-03FilderstadtR32hardJelena Jankovic6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Jankovic J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Medina Garrigues A.

Medina Garrigues A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Jankovic J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
46%
Break points saved·Even
55%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
26
Break points saved·Dominant
80
48
Break points won·Clear edge
91
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
22
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
50
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About