Nicolas Kiefer vs Jurgen MelzerDavis Cup WG R1: GER vs AUT Round Robin

Davis Cup WG R1: GER vs AUT · ATP · Round Robin
49 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 6 March 2009
hard
45 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLW
Kiefer N.
7-6 6-4 6-4
Melzer J.
Kiefer N.
77663
Melzer J.
6344

Nicolas Kiefer defeated Jurgen Melzer 7-6 6-4 6-4 in the Davis Cup WG R1: GER vs AUT round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Kiefer came in leading the head-to-head 7–1. Nicolas Kiefer extended the head-to-head to 8–1.

Key context

Head to head

71
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-06-08HalleR16grassJurgen Melzer6-1 RET
2006-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayNicolas Kiefer7-6(4) 6-3 6-1
2006-05-15Hamburg MastersR64clayNicolas Kiefer6-2 3-6 6-3
2005-10-24St. PetersburgR16carpetNicolas Kiefer3-6 6-3 7-5
2004-07-26Canada MastersQFhardNicolas Kiefer3-6 6-1 6-1
2004-02-16MemphisR16hardNicolas Kiefer7-6(5) 6-7(2) 6-3
2003-10-06ViennaR16hardNicolas Kiefer6-3 6-4
1999-10-11ViennaR16hardNicolas Kiefer6-4 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Kiefer N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Melzer J.

Melzer J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kiefer N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
52%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
86
Break points won·Dominant
58
27
Deciding sets·Even
61
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About