Jeremy Chardy vs David FerrerJohannesburg Semi-final

Johannesburg · ATP · Semi-final
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2009
hard
44 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Chardy J.
1-6 7-6 7-6
Ferrer D.
Chardy J.
1711772
Ferrer D.
669641

Jeremy Chardy defeated David Ferrer 1-6 7-6 7-6 in the Johannesburg semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — David Ferrer came in leading the head-to-head 7–1. Jeremy Chardy narrowed the head-to-head to 7–2.

Key context

Head to head

17
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-08-31US OpenR32hardJeremy Chardy7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 6-1
2014-04-13Monte Carlo MastersR32clayDavid Ferrer6-3 6-0
2014-02-17Rio de JaneiroR32clayDavid Ferrer6-2 6-3
2014-01-13Australian OpenR32hardDavid Ferrer6-2 7-6(5) 6-2
2010-06-21WimbledonR32grassDavid Ferrer7-5 6-3 4-6 3-6 7-5
2010-05-09Madrid MastersR64clayDavid Ferrer6-3 7-6(2)
2009-03-12Indian Wells MastersR32hardDavid Ferrer3-6 6-4 6-4
2006-05-29Roland GarrosR64clayDavid Ferrer6-1 6-4 3-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Chardy J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ferrer D.

Ferrer D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Chardy J.

Serve advantage — Ferrer D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
84
Break points saved·Even
97
95
Break points won·Dominant
28
73
Deciding sets·Even
95
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
56
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About