Fernando Gonzalez vs Jose Acasuso — Vina del Mar Final
Vina del Mar · ATP · Final
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2009
clay
Gonzalez F.6-1 6-3
Acasuso J.
Gonzalez F.
662
Acasuso J.
13–
Fernando Gonzalez defeated Jose Acasuso 6-1 6-3 in the Vina del Mar final on clay. The result followed the form book — Fernando Gonzalez came in leading the head-to-head 8–2, defending the title. Fernando Gonzalez extended the head-to-head to 9–2.
Key context
- Match story: Fernando Gonzalez dropped just 4 games past Jose Acasuso.
Head to head
8–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-04-20 | Barcelona | R32 | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2008-07-21 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | Jose Acasuso | 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
| 2006-08-07 | Canada Masters | QF | hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-1 7-5 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 3-6 3-6 6-3 6-3 7-5 |
| 2004-07-12 | Amersfoort | R32 | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 4-6 6-4 6-1 |
| 2003-04-21 | Barcelona | R64 | clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-1 3-6 6-3 |
| 2003-04-07 | Estoril | R16 | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-1 6-3 |
| 2002-10-07 | Lyon | R32 | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2002-09-23 | Palermo | F | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 5-7 6-3 6-1 |
| 2002-02-11 | Vina del Mar | QF | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 7-6(5) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Gonzalez F.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
65
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
79
Break points won·Slight edge
48
42
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
44
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Draw
Final
Gonzalez F.
Acasuso J.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Cuevas P.
Capdeville P.
7-57-5
Gonzalez F.
Monaco J.
6-06-2
Acasuso J.
Decoud S.
6-46-2
Robredo T.
Chela J.
0-66-36-4
R16
Decoud S.
Calleri A.
7-637-5
Robredo T.
Dabul B.
6-37-65
Chela J.
Vassallo Arguello M.
6-47-64
Acasuso J.
Bellucci T.
7-636-3
Capdeville P.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-46-3
Cuevas P.
Montanes A.
7-626-4
Monaco J.
Starace P.
6-36-3
Gonzalez F.
Gonzalez M.
7-57-67
R32
Gimeno Traver D.
Martin A.
6-36-726-6
Capdeville P.
Schwank E.
6-36-4
Calleri A.
Massu N.
7-646-1
Decoud S.
Fognini F.
6-37-5
Vassallo Arguello M.
Hernandez O.
6-37-61
Bellucci T.
Brzezicki J.
6-26-3
Chela J.
Andujar P.
6-03-66-1
Dabul B.
Junqueira D.
6-26-726-1
Cuevas P.
Lapentti N.
6-33-67-5
Monaco J.
Devilder N.
6-26-4
Starace P.
Daniel M.
6-46-4
Gonzalez M.
Pashanski B.
6-36-2