David Nalbandian vs David Ferrer — ARG vs ESP Round Robin
ARG vs ESP · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 0
Sets
Friday, 21 November 2008 ·
hard
Nalbandian D.6-3 6-2 6-3
Ferrer D.
Nalbandian D.
6663
Ferrer D.
3230
David Nalbandian defeated David Ferrer 6-3 6-2 6-3 in the ARG vs ESP round robin on hard. The upset overturned the form book — David Ferrer came in leading the head-to-head 9–4. David Nalbandian narrowed the head-to-head to 9–5.
Key context
- Match story: David Nalbandian closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–2 6–3.
Head to head
4–9| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-02-18 | Buenos Aires | R16 | clay | David Ferrer | 2-6 6-4 6-0 |
| 2012-02-20 | Buenos Aires | SF | clay | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2011-01-10 | Auckland | F | hard | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2010-08-09 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
| 2007-10-28 | Paris Masters | QF | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6 6-7 6-2 |
| 2007-08-27 | US Open | R32 | hard | David Ferrer | 6-3 3-6 4-6 7-6 7-5 |
| 2007-08-05 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6 6-1 |
| 2007-04-23 | Barcelona | QF | clay | David Ferrer | 7-6 6-2 |
| 2005-03-21 | Miami Masters | R32 | hard | David Ferrer | 7-6 6-1 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | David Nalbandian | 7-6 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2004-05-10 | Hamburg Masters | R64 | clay | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2003-07-28 | Sopot | R16 | clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
| 2002-07-15 | Umag | R32 | clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-3 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
57
80
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
86
Break points won·Clear edge
63
83
Deciding sets·Clear edge
73
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
80
74
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About