Venus Williams vs Elena Dementieva — WTA Tour Championships Round Robin
WTA Tour Championships · WTA · Round Robin
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 November 2008 ·
carpet
Williams V.6-4 4-6 6-3
Dementieva E.
Williams V.
6462
Dementieva E.
4631
Venus Williams defeated Elena Dementieva 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the WTA Tour Championships round robin on carpet. The result followed the form book — Venus Williams came in leading the head-to-head 8–3. Venus Williams extended the head-to-head to 9–3.
Key context
- Match story: Venus Williams closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–3.
Head to head
8–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-26 | WTA Tour Championships | RR | carpet | Elena Dementieva | 3-6 7-6 6-2 |
| 2009-07-27 | Stanford | SF | hard | Venus Williams | 6-0 6-1 |
| 2009-02-16 | Dubai | QF | hard | Venus Williams | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2008-06-23 | Wimbledon | SF | grass | Venus Williams | 6-1 7-6 |
| 2007-04-30 | Warsaw | R16 | clay | Venus Williams | 6-1 7-6 |
| 2005-07-09 | Fed Cup WG1 SF: RUS vs USA | RR | clay | Venus Williams | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2004-03-24 | Miami | QF | hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 5-7 7-6 |
| 2002-03-18 | Miami | QF | hard | Venus Williams | 5-7 6-3 6-2 |
| 2001-03-08 | Indian Wells | QF | hard | Venus Williams | 6-0 6-3 |
| 2000-09-19 | Olympics | F | hard | Venus Williams | 6-2 6-4 |
| 1999-09-18 | Fed Cup WG1 F: USA vs RUS | RR | hard | Elena Dementieva | 1-6 6-3 7-6 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
49%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
1.7
Double faults / match·Even
4.8
4.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 176). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
49
81
Break points saved·Dominant
36
65
Break points won·Even
94
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
88
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
68
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About