Maria Kirilenko vs Daniela HantuchovaZurich Round of 32

Zurich · WTA · Round of 32
39 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 October 2008
hard
43 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLLW
Kirilenko M.
7-5 6-2
Hantuchova D.
Kirilenko M.
762
Hantuchova D.
52

Maria Kirilenko defeated Daniela Hantuchova 7-5 6-2 in the Zurich round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Daniela Hantuchova came in leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's round of 16, but Maria Kirilenko had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 5 on hard. Maria Kirilenko narrowed the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

15
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-02-06PattayaFhardDaniela Hantuchova6-7(4) 6-3 6-3
2008-01-14Australian OpenR16hardDaniela Hantuchova1-6 6-4 6-4
2007-09-17KolkataSFhardMaria Kirilenko4-6 6-2 6-1
2007-02-19DubaiR16hardDaniela Hantuchova2-6 6-4 7-6(4)
2005-08-01San DiegoR64hardDaniela Hantuchova7-6(5) 6-1
2005-02-01TokyoR16hardDaniela Hantuchova4-6 6-0 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kirilenko M.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hantuchova D.

Hantuchova D.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kirilenko M.

Serve advantage — Kirilenko M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
59
57
Break points saved·Even
72
68
Break points won·Slight edge
74
67
Deciding sets·Slight edge
71
82
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About