David Ferrer vs Andy Roddick — ESP vs USA Round Robin
ESP vs USA · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 2
Sets
Friday, 19 September 2008 ·
clay
Ferrer D.7-6 2-6 1-6 6-4 8-6
Roddick A.
Ferrer D.
721683
Roddick A.
666462
David Ferrer defeated Andy Roddick 7-6 2-6 1-6 6-4 8-6 in the ESP vs USA round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — David Ferrer came in leading the head-to-head 6–4. David Ferrer extended the head-to-head to 7–4.
Key context
- Match story: David Ferrer closed it out in five sets, 7–6 2–6 1–6 6–4 8–6.
Head to head
6–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-06-25 | Wimbledon | R32 | grass | David Ferrer | 2-6 7-6 6-4 6-3 |
| 2011-10-09 | Shanghai Masters | QF | hard | David Ferrer | 6-7 6-2 7-6 |
| 2011-08-29 | US Open | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
| 2011-07-08 | Davis Cup WG QF: USA vs ESP | RR | grass | David Ferrer | 7-6 7-5 6-3 |
| 2009-03-12 | Indian Wells Masters | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6 3-6 6-3 |
| 2007-11-12 | Masters Cup | SF | hard | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-3 |
| 2007-08-13 | Cincinnati Masters | R16 | hard | David Ferrer | 7-6 6-4 |
| 2007-03-19 | Miami Masters | R16 | hard | Andy Roddick | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2006-03-20 | Miami Masters | QF | hard | David Ferrer | 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
| 2005-10-31 | Paris Masters | QF | hard | Andy Roddick | 2-6 6-3 7-6 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
71%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
11.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
80
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
79
Break points won·Dominant
83
12
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
74
85
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About