Juan Martin del Potro vs Igor AndreevDavis Cup WG SF: ARG vs RUS Round Robin

Davis Cup WG SF: ARG vs RUS · ATP · Round Robin
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 19 September 2008
clay
43 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLW
del Potro J.
6-4 6-2 6-1
Andreev I.
del Potro J.
6663
Andreev I.
421

Juan Martin del Potro defeated Igor Andreev 6-4 6-2 6-1 in the Davis Cup WG SF: ARG vs RUS round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Martin del Potro came in leading the head-to-head 4–0. Juan Martin del Potro extended the head-to-head to 5–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Juan Martin del Potro came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 6–2 6–1.

Head to head

40
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-05-25Roland GarrosR32clayJuan Martin del Potro6-4 7-5 6-4
2009-05-17DusseldorfRRclayJuan Martin del Potro6-3 7-6(3)
2008-10-20BaselQFhardJuan Martin del Potro6-4 7-5
2008-04-28MunichR16clayJuan Martin del Potro1-6 6-0 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
del Potro J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Andreev I.

Andreev I.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs del Potro J.

Serve advantage — del Potro J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
83
Break points won·Dominant
73
34
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About