Sam Querrey vs Julien BenneteauLas Vegas Quarter-final

Las Vegas · ATP · Quarter-final
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 March 2008
hard
44 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWL
Querrey S.
7-5 6-2
Benneteau J.
Querrey S.
762
Benneteau J.
52

Sam Querrey defeated Julien Benneteau 7-5 6-2 in the Las Vegas quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Sam Querrey came in leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's quarter-final. Sam Querrey extended the head-to-head to 6–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Sam Querrey closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

51
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-06-16EastbourneQFgrassSam Querrey7-6(5) 6-4
2012-06-11Queen's ClubR16grassSam Querrey6-3 3-6 6-3
2010-04-25Rome MastersR64clayJulien Benneteau7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(2)
2007-07-23IndianapolisR32hardSam Querrey7-6(6) 6-1
2007-02-26Las VegasRRhardSam Querrey6-2 7-6(3)
2007-02-19MemphisR16hardSam Querrey6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Querrey S.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Benneteau J.

Benneteau J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
81%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
14.8
7.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
49
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
91
Break points won·Clear edge
14
30
Deciding sets·Slight edge
63
53
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
55
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About