David Ferrer vs Richard Gasquet — Masters Cup Round Robin
Masters Cup · ATP · Round Robin
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 November 2007 ·
hard
Ferrer D.6-1 6-1
Gasquet R.
Ferrer D.
662
Gasquet R.
110
David Ferrer defeated Richard Gasquet 6-1 6-1 in the Masters Cup round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — David Ferrer came in leading the head-to-head 9–3. David Ferrer extended the head-to-head to 10–3.
Key context
- Match story: David Ferrer dropped just 2 games past Richard Gasquet.
Head to head
9–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-03 | Wimbledon | R128 | grass | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-4 5-7 6-2 |
| 2015-05-10 | Rome Masters | R32 | clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2013-09-30 | Beijing | QF | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2013-08-26 | US Open | QF | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-1 4-6 2-6 6-3 |
| 2012-08-27 | US Open | R16 | hard | David Ferrer | 7-5 7-6 6-4 |
| 2012-05-13 | Rome Masters | QF | clay | David Ferrer | 7-6 6-3 |
| 2012-01-16 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-4 6-1 |
| 2009-10-11 | Shanghai Masters | R64 | hard | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2009-02-23 | Dubai | SF | hard | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2008-07-21 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2007-10-01 | Tokyo | F | hard | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2004-07-12 | Stuttgart | R16 | grass | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
4.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
80
61
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
91
Break points won·Dominant
83
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
88
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
90
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About