Tommy Robredo vs Jose AcasusoSopot Final

Sopot · ATP · Final
44 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 July 2007
clay
43 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLLLL
Robredo T.
7-5 6-0
Acasuso J.
Robredo T.
762
Acasuso J.
50

Tommy Robredo defeated Jose Acasuso 7-5 6-0 in the Sopot final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jose Acasuso came in leading the head-to-head 5–4. Tommy Robredo narrowed the head-to-head to 5–5.

Key context

Head to head

45
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-08-23New HavenR32hardJose Acasuso3-6 7-5 7-6(5)
2009-02-23AcapulcoQFhardJose Acasuso7-5 6-2
2009-02-16Buenos AiresSFclayTommy Robredo6-4 7-6(3)
2009-02-09Costa Do SauipeSFhardTommy Robredo6-2 6-1
2009-02-02Vina del MarSFclayJose Acasuso5-7 6-2 6-4
2006-08-07Canada MastersR32hardJose Acasuso2-6 6-3 6-4
2005-08-15Cincinnati MastersR32hardJose Acasuso7-6(6) 6-2
2003-08-18Long IslandR32hardTommy Robredo2-6 6-3 7-5
2003-06-23WimbledonR128grassTommy Robredo3-6 6-3 7-6(6) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Robredo T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Acasuso J.

Acasuso J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Robredo T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 135). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
45
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
79
Break points won·Clear edge
26
42
Deciding sets·Slight edge
73
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About