Radek Stepanek vs James BlakeLos Angeles Final

Los Angeles · ATP · Final
47 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 July 2007
hard
46 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Stepanek R.
7-6 5-7 6-2
Blake J.
Stepanek R.
79562
Blake J.
67721

Radek Stepanek defeated James Blake 7-6 5-7 6-2 in the Los Angeles final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — James Blake came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, but Radek Stepanek had been the form player, winning 8 of their last 9 on hard. Radek Stepanek narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Radek Stepanek closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–2.

Head to head

24
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-05-21DusseldorfRRclayRadek Stepanek6-2 6-1
2008-03-27Miami MastersR16hardJames Blake6-3 6-4
2005-08-01WashingtonR32hardJames Blake6-4 2-6 6-4
2004-03-08Indian Wells MastersR128hardJames Blake6-2 6-2
2003-08-04Canada MastersR64hardJames Blake7-6(3) 6-4
2003-05-05Rome MastersR64clayRadek Stepanek6-2 1-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Stepanek R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blake J.

Blake J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Stepanek R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
6.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
64
54
Break points saved·Even
92
88
Break points won·Clear edge
39
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About