Elena Vesnina vs Anabel Medina Garrigues's-Hertogenbosch Round of 32

's-Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 32
39 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 June 2007
grass
43 yrs · 169 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Vesnina E.
7-6 3-6 6-3
Medina Garrigues A.
Vesnina E.
77362
Medina Garrigues A.
64631

Elena Vesnina defeated Anabel Medina Garrigues 7-6 3-6 6-3 in the 's-Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Anabel Medina Garrigues came in leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's round of 32. Elena Vesnina narrowed the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Elena Vesnina closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

14
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-08-22New HavenR16hardAnabel Medina Garrigues6-2 7-6(5)
2011-03-21MiamiR32hardAnabel Medina Garrigues6-3 6-4
2007-01-15Australian OpenR128hardElena Vesnina6-7(7) 6-1 6-1
2007-01-08HobartR32hardAnabel Medina Garrigues6-1 6-3
2006-05-22StrasbourgQFclayAnabel Medina Garrigues6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Vesnina E.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Medina Garrigues A.

Medina Garrigues A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Vesnina E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
26
Break points saved·Dominant
77
48
Break points won·Slight edge
69
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About