Samantha Stosur vs Amelie Mauresmo — Rome Round of 32
Rome · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 May 2007
clay
Stosur S.7-5 6-7 7-6
Mauresmo A.
Stosur S.
764792
Mauresmo A.
577671
Samantha Stosur defeated Amelie Mauresmo 7-5 6-7 7-6 in the Rome round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Amelie Mauresmo came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Samantha Stosur narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.
Key context
- Match story: Samantha Stosur edged Amelie Mauresmo in three tight sets (7–5 6–7 7–6).
Head to head
2–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-03-23 | Miami | R16 | hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2008-06-16 | Eastbourne | R16 | grass | Samantha Stosur | 1-2 RET |
| 2006-10-16 | Zurich | R16 | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 7-6(4) 6-3 |
| 2006-06-26 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2006-03-20 | Miami | R64 | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-0 6-0 |
| 2005-05-09 | Rome | R32 | clay | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-0 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Mauresmo A.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
44%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
5.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 114). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
45
68
Break points saved·Even
85
82
Break points won·Clear edge
61
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
47
65
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 60%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Schnyder P.
Williams S.
6-32-67-65
Jankovic J.
Dementieva E.
6-26-1
Kuznetsova S.
Safina D.
6-16-3
Hantuchova D.
Medina Garrigues A.
7-687-5
R16
Dementieva E.
Petrova N.
4-3
Williams S.
Peer S.
6-36-3
Jankovic J.
Bondarenko A.
6-47-5
Kuznetsova S.
Fedak Y.
7-646-1
Schnyder P.
Stosur S.
6-46-4
Medina Garrigues A.
Vierin N.
6-16-1
Hantuchova D.
Chakvetadze A.
6-26-3
Safina D.
Bondarenko K.
6-26-3
R32
Bondarenko K.
Sprem K.
6-36-4
Dementieva E.
Castano C.
6-46-3
Petrova N.
Shaughnessy M.
7-656-1
Kuznetsova S.
Santangelo M.
6-36-3
Chakvetadze A.
Yan Z.
6-16-3
Williams S.
Krajicek M.
6-46-1
Hantuchova D.
Bammer S.
6-16-2
Medina Garrigues A.
Srebotnik K.
6-36-2
Safina D.
Kanepi K.
7-656-2
Vierin N.
Voskoboeva G.
4-66-46-4
Peer S.
Sugiyama A.
6-06-2
Schnyder P.
Tu M.
6-46-0
Fedak Y.
Dechy N.
1-66-26-2
Stosur S.
Mauresmo A.
7-56-747-67
Jankovic J.
Paszek T.
6-36-4
Bondarenko A.
Garbin T.
6-46-2
R64
Kanepi K.
Dominguez Lino L.
6-36-3
Peer S.
Radwanska A.
6-02-0
Sprem K.
Daniilidou E.
3-66-46-3
Santangelo M.
Morigami A.
6-26-0
Voskoboeva G.
Brianti A.
6-26-3
Stosur S.
Schiavone F.
6-36-4
Fedak Y.
Oprandi R.
6-33-66-3
Schnyder P.
Bardina V.
6-16-2
Tu M.
Vinci R.
2-66-26-4
Shaughnessy M.
Loit E.
6-36-2
Dechy N.
Groenefeld A.
6-06-4
Srebotnik K.
Muller M.
6-46-2
Paszek T.
Pratt N.
6-716-06-2
Yan Z.
Beltrame S.
2-66-06-3
Sugiyama A.
Kirilenko M.
6-45-77-5
Krajicek M.
Puchkova O.
6-16-2
Medina Garrigues A.
Zheng J.
6-26-2
Bammer S.
Dulko G.
7-57-5
Garbin T.
Pennetta F.
6-37-63
Hantuchova D.
Rezai A.
4-66-16-2
Castano C.
Knapp K.
6-17-5
Bondarenko A.
Sun T.
6-767-56-2
Dementieva E.
Camerin M.
6-16-2
Bondarenko K.
Errani S.
4-66-36-4