Jelena Jankovic vs Elena Dementieva — Rome Quarter-final
Rome · WTA · Quarter-final
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 May 2007
clay
Jankovic J.6-2 6-1
Dementieva E.
Jankovic J.
662
Dementieva E.
21–
Jelena Jankovic defeated Elena Dementieva 6-2 6-1 in the Rome quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jelena Jankovic came in leading the head-to-head 6–3, defending last year's quarter-final. Jelena Jankovic extended the head-to-head to 7–3.
Key context
- Match story: Jelena Jankovic dropped just 3 games past Elena Dementieva.
Head to head
6–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-08-10 | Cincinnati | SF | hard | Jelena Jankovic | 7-6(2) 0-6 7-6(6) |
| 2008-10-06 | Moscow | SF | hard | Jelena Jankovic | 0-6 6-1 6-0 |
| 2008-08-25 | US Open | SF | hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2008-05-05 | Berlin | QF | grass | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 2-6 6-3 |
| 2008-03-24 | Miami | QF | hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-1 3-1 RET |
| 2006-08-28 | US Open | QF | hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2006-08-07 | Los Angeles | F | hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
| 2004-08-23 | New Haven | QF | hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2004-01-19 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-1 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
49%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
5.2
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
59
80
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
86
Break points won·Even
91
92
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
87
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
50
68
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 60%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Schnyder P.
Williams S.
6-32-67-65
Jankovic J.
Dementieva E.
6-26-1
Kuznetsova S.
Safina D.
6-16-3
Hantuchova D.
Medina Garrigues A.
7-687-5
R16
Dementieva E.
Petrova N.
4-3
Williams S.
Peer S.
6-36-3
Jankovic J.
Bondarenko A.
6-47-5
Kuznetsova S.
Fedak Y.
7-646-1
Schnyder P.
Stosur S.
6-46-4
Medina Garrigues A.
Vierin N.
6-16-1
Hantuchova D.
Chakvetadze A.
6-26-3
Safina D.
Bondarenko K.
6-26-3
R32
Bondarenko K.
Sprem K.
6-36-4
Dementieva E.
Castano C.
6-46-3
Petrova N.
Shaughnessy M.
7-656-1
Kuznetsova S.
Santangelo M.
6-36-3
Chakvetadze A.
Yan Z.
6-16-3
Williams S.
Krajicek M.
6-46-1
Hantuchova D.
Bammer S.
6-16-2
Medina Garrigues A.
Srebotnik K.
6-36-2
Safina D.
Kanepi K.
7-656-2
Vierin N.
Voskoboeva G.
4-66-46-4
Peer S.
Sugiyama A.
6-06-2
Schnyder P.
Tu M.
6-46-0
Fedak Y.
Dechy N.
1-66-26-2
Stosur S.
Mauresmo A.
7-56-747-67
Jankovic J.
Paszek T.
6-36-4
Bondarenko A.
Garbin T.
6-46-2
R64
Kanepi K.
Dominguez Lino L.
6-36-3
Peer S.
Radwanska A.
6-02-0
Sprem K.
Daniilidou E.
3-66-46-3
Santangelo M.
Morigami A.
6-26-0
Voskoboeva G.
Brianti A.
6-26-3
Stosur S.
Schiavone F.
6-36-4
Fedak Y.
Oprandi R.
6-33-66-3
Schnyder P.
Bardina V.
6-16-2
Tu M.
Vinci R.
2-66-26-4
Shaughnessy M.
Loit E.
6-36-2
Dechy N.
Groenefeld A.
6-06-4
Srebotnik K.
Muller M.
6-46-2
Paszek T.
Pratt N.
6-716-06-2
Yan Z.
Beltrame S.
2-66-06-3
Sugiyama A.
Kirilenko M.
6-45-77-5
Krajicek M.
Puchkova O.
6-16-2
Medina Garrigues A.
Zheng J.
6-26-2
Bammer S.
Dulko G.
7-57-5
Garbin T.
Pennetta F.
6-37-63
Hantuchova D.
Rezai A.
4-66-16-2
Castano C.
Knapp K.
6-17-5
Bondarenko A.
Sun T.
6-767-56-2
Dementieva E.
Camerin M.
6-16-2
Bondarenko K.
Errani S.
4-66-36-4