Juan Martin del Potro vs Jurgen MelzerDavis Cup WG R1: AUT vs ARG Round Robin

Davis Cup WG R1: AUT vs ARG · ATP · Round Robin
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
3 — 2
Sets
Friday, 9 February 2007
carpet
45 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLW
del Potro J.
7-6 3-6 6-4 4-6 6-2
Melzer J.
del Potro J.
7736463
Melzer J.
6464622

Juan Martin del Potro defeated Jurgen Melzer 7-6 3-6 6-4 4-6 6-2 in the Davis Cup WG R1: AUT vs ARG round robin on carpet. The result followed the form book — Juan Martin del Potro came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Juan Martin del Potro extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

Head to head

41
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-10-11Shanghai MastersR32hardJurgen Melzer7-5 2-1 RET
2009-08-31US OpenR64hardJuan Martin del Potro7-6(6) 6-3 6-3
2009-03-12Indian Wells MastersR32hardJuan Martin del Potro6-2 2-6 7-6(2)
2008-07-14KitzbuhelFclayJuan Martin del Potro6-2 6-1
2007-08-27US OpenR64hardJuan Martin del Potro6-3 6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
del Potro J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Melzer J.

Melzer J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs del Potro J.

Serve advantage — del Potro J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
44
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
86
Break points won·Dominant
73
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About