Thomas Johansson vs Max Mirnyi — Davis Cup WG R1: BLR vs SWE Round Robin
Davis Cup WG R1: BLR vs SWE · ATP · Round Robin
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 9 February 2007
hard
Johansson T.6-4 6-4 6-4
Mirnyi M.
Johansson T.
6663
Mirnyi M.
444–
Thomas Johansson defeated Max Mirnyi 6-4 6-4 6-4 in the Davis Cup WG R1: BLR vs SWE round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Thomas Johansson came in leading the head-to-head 6–1. Thomas Johansson extended the head-to-head to 7–1.
Key context
- Match story: Thomas Johansson edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4 6–4.
Head to head
6–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-03-05 | Indian Wells Masters | R128 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 7-6(7) |
| 2006-06-12 | Queen's Club | R64 | grass | Max Mirnyi | 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(4) |
| 2005-06-20 | Wimbledon | R16 | grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 7-5 6-4 |
| 2004-06-14 | Nottingham | R32 | grass | Thomas Johansson | 2-6 6-1 6-4 |
| 2001-05-14 | Hamburg Masters | R32 | clay | Thomas Johansson | 6-2 6-0 |
| 2001-02-26 | Dubai | QF | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-4 |
| 1999-08-02 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | Thomas Johansson | 7-5 7-6(6) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
7.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
4.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
54
43
Break points saved·Even
80
76
Break points won·Slight edge
51
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
45
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
60
53
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About