Marion Bartoli vs Jill CraybasJapan Open Round of 32

Japan Open · WTA · Round of 32
41 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2006
hard
52 yrs · 160 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWL
Bartoli M.
6-2 3-6 6-4
Craybas J.
Bartoli M.
6362
Craybas J.
2641

Marion Bartoli defeated Jill Craybas 6-2 3-6 6-4 in the Japan Open round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marion Bartoli came in leading the head-to-head 6–1, defending last year's round of 32. Marion Bartoli extended the head-to-head to 7–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Marion Bartoli closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

61
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2010-10-11OsakaQFhardMarion Bartoli6-1 6-2
2010-03-08Indian WellsR32hardMarion Bartoli6-2 6-0
2006-09-25SeoulR32hardMarion Bartoli6-4 6-1
2006-08-07Los AngelesR32hardMarion Bartoli6-2 6-0
2005-06-20WimbledonR64grassJill Craybas6-1 6-4
2005-01-03AucklandR16hardMarion Bartoli2-6 6-0 6-1
2004-08-24Forest HillsR16hardMarion Bartoli7-6(3) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Bartoli M.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Craybas J.

Craybas J.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Bartoli M.

Serve advantage — Bartoli M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
52%
Return points won·Even
47%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
0.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
19
Break points saved·Dominant
76
40
Break points won·Dominant
92
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
30
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
80
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About