Francesca Schiavone vs Amelie Mauresmo — Fed Cup WG R1: FRA vs ITA Round Robin
Fed Cup WG R1: FRA vs ITA · WTA · Round Robin
2 — 1
Sets
Saturday, 22 April 2006
hard
Schiavone F.4-6 7-6 6-4
Mauresmo A.
Schiavone F.
47762
Mauresmo A.
66441
Francesca Schiavone defeated Amelie Mauresmo 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Fed Cup WG R1: FRA vs ITA round robin on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Amelie Mauresmo came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Francesca Schiavone narrowed the head-to-head to 4–4.
Key context
- Match story: Francesca Schiavone dropped the opening set before beating Amelie Mauresmo 4–6 7–6 6–4.
Head to head
3–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-08-17 | Toronto | R64 | hard | Francesca Schiavone | 6-2 3-6 6-1 |
| 2005-10-10 | Moscow | R16 | hard | Francesca Schiavone | 6-1 6-1 |
| 2004-08-30 | US Open | R16 | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2004-07-10 | Fed Cup WG QF: ITA vs FRA | RR | clay | Amelie Mauresmo | 7-6(2) 6-2 |
| 2004-04-26 | Warsaw | QF | clay | Francesca Schiavone | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 |
| 2004-01-12 | Sydney | SF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-3 7-6(2) |
| 2002-02-05 | Paris | QF | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Mauresmo A.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
4.9
4.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 170). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
40
68
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
82
Break points won·Even
72
75
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
65
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About