Dmitry Tursunov vs Richard Gasquet — Davis Cup WG QF: FRA vs RUS Round Robin
Davis Cup WG QF: FRA vs RUS · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 2
Sets
Friday, 7 April 2006
carpet
Tursunov D.6-1 3-6 6-7 6-3 7-5
Gasquet R.
Tursunov D.
6364673
Gasquet R.
1677352
Dmitry Tursunov defeated Richard Gasquet 6-1 3-6 6-7 6-3 7-5 in the Davis Cup WG QF: FRA vs RUS round robin on carpet. The result followed the form book — Dmitry Tursunov came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Dmitry Tursunov extended the head-to-head to 5–3.
Key context
- Match story: Dmitry Tursunov came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 3–6 6–7 6–3 7–5.
Head to head
4–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-08-26 | US Open | R32 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 2-6 6-4 4-2 RET |
| 2010-10-04 | Tokyo | R16 | hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-4 |
| 2009-01-12 | Sydney | R32 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 7-6(4) 6-4 |
| 2008-07-28 | Cincinnati Masters | R32 | hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 7-6(8) 6-0 |
| 2008-03-27 | Miami Masters | R64 | hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) |
| 2008-03-03 | Dubai | R32 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2008-01-07 | Sydney | R16 | hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Gasquet R.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
58
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
97
Break points won·Slight edge
44
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
66
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
94
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About