David Nalbandian vs Robin Soderling — Davis Cup WG R1: ARG vs SWE Round Robin
Davis Cup WG R1: ARG vs SWE · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 1
Sets
Friday, 10 February 2006
clay
Nalbandian D.3-6 6-2 6-4 6-1
Soderling R.
Nalbandian D.
36663
Soderling R.
62411
David Nalbandian defeated Robin Soderling 3-6 6-2 6-4 6-1 in the Davis Cup WG R1: ARG vs SWE round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — David Nalbandian came in leading the head-to-head 5–1. David Nalbandian extended the head-to-head to 6–1.
Key context
- Match story: David Nalbandian dropped the opening set before beating Robin Soderling 3–6 6–2 6–4 6–1.
Head to head
5–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-08-09 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | David Nalbandian | 4-6 6-4 6-1 |
| 2008-10-06 | Stockholm | F | hard | David Nalbandian | 6-2 5-7 6-3 |
| 2008-04-11 | Davis Cup WG QF: ARG vs SWE | RR | clay | David Nalbandian | 6-4 1-6 4-6 6-4 9-7 |
| 2005-05-09 | Hamburg Masters | R64 | clay | Robin Soderling | 7-6(8) 7-5 |
| 2004-10-18 | Madrid Masters | R32 | clay | David Nalbandian | 7-6(5) 6-3 |
| 2004-05-03 | Rome Masters | R64 | clay | David Nalbandian | 6-4 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
9.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
72
74
Break points saved·Even
88
92
Break points won·Even
69
71
Deciding sets·Slight edge
72
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
84
67
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About