Sebastien Grosjean vs Nicolas Kiefer — Davis Cup WG R1: GER vs FRA Round Robin
Davis Cup WG R1: GER vs FRA · ATP · Round Robin
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 10 February 2006
hard
Grosjean S.7-5 7-6 6-0
Kiefer N.
Grosjean S.
77963
Kiefer N.
5670–
Sebastien Grosjean defeated Nicolas Kiefer 7-5 7-6 6-0 in the Davis Cup WG R1: GER vs FRA round robin on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Kiefer came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Sebastien Grosjean narrowed the head-to-head to 4–4.
Key context
- Match story: Sebastien Grosjean handed Nicolas Kiefer a third-set bagel in a 7–5 7–6 6–0 win.
Head to head
3–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-26 | Lyon | R32 | clay | Nicolas Kiefer | 4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(2) |
| 2006-01-16 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 0-6 6-4 6-7(1) 8-6 |
| 2005-05-09 | Hamburg Masters | R32 | clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2004-03-22 | Miami Masters | R16 | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2002-08-12 | Indianapolis | R16 | hard | Sebastien Grosjean | 7-6(4) 6-3 |
| 2000-07-10 | Gstaad | R16 | clay | Sebastien Grosjean | 6-3 6-1 |
| 1999-08-09 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 7-5 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
55%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
7.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.2
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 122). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
47
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
75
81
Break points won·Even
56
58
Deciding sets·Clear edge
42
61
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
58
68
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About