Santiago Giraldo vs Pablo CuevasDavis Cup G2 R1: COL vs URU Round Robin

Davis Cup G2 R1: COL vs URU · ATP · Round Robin
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 10 February 2006
clay
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
Giraldo S.
6-4 7-6 7-6
Cuevas P.
Giraldo S.
677773
Cuevas P.
46463

Santiago Giraldo defeated Pablo Cuevas 6-4 7-6 7-6 in the Davis Cup G2 R1: COL vs URU round robin on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Pablo Cuevas came in leading the head-to-head 6–0. Santiago Giraldo claimed a first win over Pablo Cuevas in seven meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 6–1.

Key context

Head to head

06
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-08Buenos AiresR16clayPablo Cuevas6-4 6-2
2015-03-06Davis Cup G1 R2: URU vs COLRRclayPablo Cuevas6-2 6-3 6-3
2015-02-09Sao PauloSFclayPablo Cuevas6-4 6-3
2011-03-04Davis Cup G1 R1: URU vs COLRRclayPablo Cuevas6-2 6-3 6-4
2008-07-07StuttgartR32grassPablo Cuevas4-6 6-4 7-6(11)
2008-02-08Davis Cup G1 R1: URU vs COLRRclayPablo Cuevas6-4 3-6 5-7 7-6(6) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Giraldo S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cuevas P.

Cuevas P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Giraldo S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
93
Break points won·Clear edge
19
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About