Nicolas Massu vs Fernando Gonzalez — Vina del Mar Semi-final
Vina del Mar · ATP · Semi-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2006
clay
Massu N.3-6 7-6 6-4
Gonzalez F.
Massu N.
37762
Gonzalez F.
66341
Nicolas Massu defeated Fernando Gonzalez 3-6 7-6 6-4 in the Vina del Mar semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Fernando Gonzalez came in leading the head-to-head 5–0, defending last year's final. Nicolas Massu claimed a first win over Fernando Gonzalez in six meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 5–1.
Key context
- Match story: Nicolas Massu dropped the opening set before beating Fernando Gonzalez 3–6 7–6 6–4.
Head to head
0–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-08-31 | US Open | R128 | hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-3 6-3 6-3 |
| 2007-05-07 | Rome Masters | R16 | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 |
| 2006-08-14 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2004-02-09 | Vina del Mar | QF | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-6(4) 6-3 |
| 2000-05-01 | Orlando | F | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-2 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Gonzalez F.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
2.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
47
65
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
90
Break points won·Even
47
48
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
56
74
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Draw
Quarter-finals
Massu N.
Cuadrado C.
4-67-646-3
Acasuso J.
Friedl L.
3-66-17-5
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Montanes A.
6-22-66-2
Gonzalez F.
Pashanski B.
6-46-3
R16
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Gaudio G.
6-766-16-4
Pashanski B.
Di Mauro A.
6-727-646-0
Montanes A.
Ventura S.
4-66-46-3
Massu N.
Marin J.
6-36-4
Gonzalez F.
del Potro J.
6-37-64
Friedl L.
Aguilar J.
7-646-3
Acasuso J.
Marcaccio G.
6-16-1
Cuadrado C.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-36-3
R32
Marcaccio G.
Horna L.
7-660-66-3
Gaudio G.
Parada F.
6-16-4
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Almagro N.
0-66-36-1
Gonzalez F.
Mazarakis V.
6-16-2
del Potro J.
Portas A.
6-26-2
Di Mauro A.
Garcia A.
6-766-16-4
Pashanski B.
Saretta F.
1-67-56-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Calleri A.
1-66-36-3
Cuadrado C.
Behrend T.
7-56-0
Marin J.
Armando H.
6-26-3
Massu N.
Daniel M.
6-36-3
Friedl L.
Berlocq C.
6-756-36-1
Aguilar J.
Hormazabal G.
6-46-2
Ventura S.
Capdeville P.
6-30-66-3
Montanes A.
Monaco J.
6-46-2
Acasuso J.
Navarro I.
6-36-2