Amelie Mauresmo vs Kim Clijsters — WTA Tour Championships Round Robin
WTA Tour Championships · WTA · Round Robin
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 November 2005 ·
carpet
Mauresmo A.6-3 7-6
Clijsters K.
Mauresmo A.
672
Clijsters K.
360
Amelie Mauresmo defeated Kim Clijsters 6-3 7-6 in the WTA Tour Championships round robin on carpet. The upset overturned the form book — Kim Clijsters came in leading the head-to-head 8–6. Amelie Mauresmo narrowed the head-to-head to 8–7.
Key context
- Match story: Amelie Mauresmo closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.
Head to head
6–8| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-02-12 | Antwerp | F | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 7-6 |
| 2006-11-06 | WTA Tour Championships | SF | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
| 2006-02-13 | Antwerp | F | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
| 2006-01-16 | Australian Open | SF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 5-7 6-2 3-2 |
| 2005-03-23 | Miami | SF | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-1 6-0 |
| 2003-11-05 | WTA Tour Championships | F | carpet | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-0 |
| 2003-11-05 | WTA Tour Championships | RR | carpet | Kim Clijsters | 3-6 6-4 6-4 |
| 2003-10-06 | Filderstadt | QF | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2003-08-25 | US Open | QF | hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2003-05-12 | Rome | F | clay | Kim Clijsters | 3-6 7-6 6-0 |
| 2002-10-07 | Filderstadt | SF | hard | Kim Clijsters | 3-6 6-3 7-5 |
| 2002-08-26 | US Open | R16 | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 4-6 6-3 7-5 |
| 2000-03-10 | Indian Wells | R64 | hard | Kim Clijsters | 3-0 |
| 1999-10-18 | Bratislava | F | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-3 6-3 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
46%
48%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.7
4.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (193 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
75
79
Break points saved·Slight edge
66
76
Break points won·Slight edge
84
90
Deciding sets·Slight edge
82
77
Tiebreaks·Even
65
67
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About