Shahar Peer vs Marion BartoliJapan Open Round of 32

Japan Open · WTA · Round of 32
39 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2005
hard
41 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
Peer S.
6-4 6-4
Bartoli M.
Peer S.
662
Bartoli M.
44

Shahar Peer defeated Marion Bartoli 6-4 6-4 in the Japan Open round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Shahar Peer came in leading the head-to-head 6–2, defending last year's round of 32. Shahar Peer extended the head-to-head to 7–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Shahar Peer edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

62
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-02-21DohaR16hardMarion Bartoli6-1 6-0
2010-05-24Roland GarrosR32clayShahar Peer7-6(7) 6-2
2009-03-09Indian WellsR64hardShahar Peer1-6 6-4 7-5
2007-06-25WimbledonR32grassMarion Bartoli6-3 6-2
2006-10-23LinzR32hardShahar Peer6-3 7-6(4)
2006-08-14MontrealR16hardShahar Peer2-6 7-5 6-4
2005-05-23Roland GarrosR128clayShahar Peer6-4 6-3
2005-03-23MiamiR64hardShahar Peer2-6 6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Peer S.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Bartoli M.

Bartoli M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Peer S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
45%
Service points won·Even
54%
58%
Return points won·Even
45%
47%
Break points saved·Slight edge
50%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.1
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
5.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
39
74
Break points saved·Dominant
34
76
Break points won·Clear edge
73
92
Deciding sets·Clear edge
62
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
68
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About