Andreas Seppi vs Tomas BerdychPalermo Round of 32

Palermo · ATP · Round of 32
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2005
clay
40 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLWL
Seppi A.
4-6 6-4 6-4
Berdych T.
Seppi A.
4662
Berdych T.
6441

Andreas Seppi defeated Tomas Berdych 4-6 6-4 6-4 in the Palermo round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Berdych came in leading the head-to-head 9–1, defending the title. Andreas Seppi narrowed the head-to-head to 9–2.

Key context

Head to head

19
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-08-19Winston-SalemR64hardTomas Berdych6-1 3-6 6-3
2015-02-09RotterdamR16hardTomas Berdych6-0 3-6 6-3
2015-01-05DohaSFhardTomas Berdych6-2 6-3
2014-02-10RotterdamR32hardTomas Berdych6-3 6-3
2012-10-29Paris MastersR32hardTomas Berdych7-6(6) 6-2
2012-10-07Shanghai MastersR32hardTomas Berdych6-3 6-3
2012-02-13RotterdamQFhardTomas Berdych6-3 6-4
2008-08-11Beijing OlympicsR32hardTomas Berdych6-3 7-6(4)
2008-07-28Cincinnati MastersR32hardAndreas Seppi5-7 7-5 7-5
2004-09-27PalermoQFclayTomas Berdych6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Seppi A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Berdych T.

Berdych T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Serve advantage — Berdych T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
7.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
82
Break points saved·Even
94
98
Break points won·Dominant
45
70
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
32
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About